Insights
Some of the hardest programmes in the energy sector are the ones no single organisation controls. Market wide changes, the kind delivered through central bodies such as Smart DCC and coordinated across every participant, break most of the assumptions that ordinary programme planning rests on. If you are delivering your part of one, here is why they are different and how to plan for it.
By Christopher Fagan
On a normal programme, most of what determines success is within your control. On a market wide programme, a large share of your risk lives in central systems, in other participants and in an industry timetable you cannot move. You can do everything right and still be held up by a dependency you do not own.
Industry wide dates are set centrally and apply to everyone at once. There is no quiet renegotiation of your own go live. You either meet the shared date or you are visibly the participant that did not.
End to end testing crosses organisational boundaries and depends on other parties being ready at the same time as you. Interface testing that would be routine internally becomes a coordination problem across the market.
What the change actually requires is often clarified across the industry over time, which means requirements can firm up later than you would like, compressing the window to build against them.
Teams that deliver market wide change well treat it less like a project they run and more like a position they hold in a larger system. They obsess about dependencies, they stay close to the centre, and they make sure their own house is in order so that when the fixed date comes, the delay, if there is one, belongs to someone else.
Our consultants have worked on market wide energy change including with Smart DCC. See regulated markets and energy and utilities, or get in touch.
If any of this is live for you right now, the senior people who wrote it are the people you would work with.